<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Business on A Geek&#39;s Life</title>
    <link>https://archive.rustgeek.me/tags/business/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Business on A Geek&#39;s Life</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://archive.rustgeek.me/tags/business/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The Friday Read: The Case for Clawbacks</title>
      <link>https://archive.rustgeek.me/2012/02/03/the-friday-read-the-case-for-clawbacks/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
       <guid isPermaLink="false">https://archive.rustgeek.me/2012/02/03/the-friday-read-the-case-for-clawbacks/</guid> 
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Michael Schrage &lt;a href=&#34;http://blogs.hbr.org/schrage/2012/02/bonuses-are-good-but-clawbacks.html?&#34;&gt;mulls&lt;/a&gt; over the &amp;lsquo;de-knighting&amp;rsquo; of Fred Goodwin  - the former RBS CEO who presided over its meteoric rise from a relatively small Scottish bank to at one stage the largest bank in the world -  and argues the case for better designed incentive systems that reward decisions which are inherently sustainable rather than geared towards risky short term profit:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;hellip;institutionalized imbalances in compensation encourage too many people to &amp;ldquo;game the system.&amp;rdquo; Traders are notorious for developing schemes that sync with how their compensation and bonuses will be paid out. Their defenders argue that consistent losers will, of course, get fired — so what&amp;rsquo;s the long-term point of clawbacks? But that ignores the (obvious) behavioral reality that traders who know that their greatest risk is losing their job — instead of their money — might be prone to making even larger bets to win comparably larger bonuses. The upside potential overwhelms the downside exposure. That&amp;rsquo;s a proven recipe for disaster.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
