<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Soulmates on A Geek&#39;s Life</title>
    <link>https://archive.rustgeek.me/tags/soulmates/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Soulmates on A Geek&#39;s Life</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:45:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://archive.rustgeek.me/tags/soulmates/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Right Girl, Right Time, Wrong Context... Or Not?</title>
      <link>https://archive.rustgeek.me/2009/11/26/right-girl-right-time-wrong-context-or-not/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
       <guid isPermaLink="false">https://archive.rustgeek.me/2009/11/26/right-girl-right-time-wrong-context-or-not/</guid> 
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The following is an attempt to be coherent at 3.45am. If the logic is fuzzy, the imagery abstruse and the conclusions bother on the insane, blame it on reading &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.gladwell.com/&#34;&gt;Malcolm Gladwell&lt;/a&gt; into the wee hours of the morning!&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In response to &lt;a href=&#34;https://archive.rustgeek.me/2009/03/16/finally-the-truth-about-di/&#34;&gt;my rant/ sobfest in March&lt;/a&gt; about losing my friend Di, &lt;a href=&#34;http://afrogeekchic.wordpress.com/&#34;&gt;LoloBloggs&lt;/a&gt; pointed me to a post in which she argued that the &lt;a href=&#34;http://afrogeekchic.wordpress.com/2008/08/10/right-girl-wrong-time-wrong-argument/&#34;&gt;right girl, wrong time argument&lt;/a&gt; was merely an excuse to prime women up for the inevitable future break up. Whilst that may be true in some situations, in one of those &lt;em&gt;not-so random&lt;/em&gt; brain waves, it crossed my mind that the rightness or wrongness of the argument was peripheral to the fact that it fit the observed data for a reason - it is pragmatic!  A further thought was a what-if, &lt;em&gt;what if&lt;/em&gt; there exists a third dimension that when coupled with the right person and the right time serves as a useful predictor of how likely a person-connection is likely to proceed beyond the realms of casual acquaintance-ship? I would like to suggest that that third dimension is that of &lt;em&gt;context&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
